Feral
Nature Writing

Feral

by George Monbiot

Allen Lane
2013
317
Non-fiction / Rewilding
7 hrs
4.5 / 5 — Highly recommended
✦ organicbook Pick

George Monbiot opens this book with an admission: he is bored. Not with life, but with the neutered, depleted, managed version of nature that remains in most of the developed world — a landscape from which wildness, complexity, and ecological surprise have been systematically removed. *Feral* is the argument for getting all of it back.

The Rewilding Concept

Monbiot’s central argument is that large parts of the land and sea — particularly in Europe, where millennia of grazing have reduced ecosystems to a fraction of their former complexity — should be actively returned to ecological self-regulation. Not managed as reserves, not maintained as heritage landscapes, but left to rewild: to be colonised by the species and processes that would naturally occur there.

The flagship mechanism is the reintroduction of apex predators. Monbiot uses the celebrated case of wolf reintroduction to Yellowstone — the “trophic cascade” that followed, in which the presence of wolves changed where deer grazed, which allowed riverbank vegetation to recover, which changed river morphology — to demonstrate how predators restructure entire ecosystems.

Wales and Scotland as Case Studies

Monbiot focuses much of his attention on the British uplands, and specifically on Wales, where he lives. He argues that the heavily subsidised grazing of sheep on Welsh and Scottish hillsides has created what he memorably calls “the sheep-wrecked hills” — denuded landscapes with minimal biodiversity, maintained at taxpayer expense, and aestheticised as “natural” landscape through decades of cultural conditioning.

This is the book’s most provocative intervention: the claim that what we consider natural British countryside is in fact an ecological desert created by millennia of agricultural pressure and protected by political interest groups.

Rewilding is not a process of restoration to a fixed historical point; it is a process of ecological self-regulation, of allowing complex systems to find their own dynamic equilibria.

— George Monbiot, Feral

6 Key Ideas From This Book

01
Trophic Cascades

When apex predators are removed, the animals they prey on overpopulate and overgraze. When predators return, prey animals move more and graze less intensively, allowing vegetation, soil life, and entire ecosystems to recover. One species changes everything below it.

02
The Sheep Are the Problem

British upland grazing is ecologically catastrophic and economically irrational — sustained entirely by subsidy. Monbiot argues that replacing sheep farming with rewilding across large areas of marginal upland would deliver greater ecological, economic, and even aesthetic value.

03
Ecological Boredom

Monbiot argues that the psychological experience of wildness — of encountering genuinely untamed nature — is a human need that depleted landscapes cannot meet, and that this deficit contributes to the disconnection from nature that drives ecological destruction.

04
The Sea as the Most Overgrazed Land

Marine rewilding — the reintroduction of large predators, the protection of keystone species, the creation of no-take zones — offers some of the most dramatic ecological recovery opportunities available. Monbiot's account of ocean rewilding is the most scientifically exciting part of the book.

05
Rewilding Is Not Anti-Human

Monbiot is careful to distinguish rewilding from the colonial tradition of creating nature reserves by displacing human communities. His vision is of voluntary rewilding on marginal land that is already economically unviable for agriculture.

06
Ecological Literacy Is a Political Act

Knowing what a landscape could be — its full ecological potential — is the precondition for wanting to restore it. The poverty of public ecological knowledge is itself a political problem, because depleted baselines create depleted ambitions.

Any Weaknesses?

Monbiot’s polemic occasionally oversimplifies for effect. His attacks on Welsh hill farming, while largely accurate, can read as contemptuous of the communities and cultures sustained by those practices — a failure of empathy that undermines his political case. Rewilding is more likely to succeed with farming communities than against them.

The Yellowstone wolf case, while genuine, has become somewhat simplified in the retelling, and some ecologists have pushed back on the more dramatic claims about trophic cascades. The science is real but messier than Monbiot’s account suggests.

✓ Perfect for

Anyone who has looked at a heavily managed British hillside — or any depleted landscape — and felt obscurely that something was missing, without knowing what or why.

✓ Pair with

Wilding by Isabella Tree for the lived experience of rewilding on a working British farm, and Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer for the relational philosophy that underpins the best rewilding thinking.

✓ Unexpected audience

Land economists and rural policy analysts. The book makes an economic case — in terms of ecosystem services, tourism, flood prevention, and carbon sequestration — for rewilding that is more rigorous than the advocacy context suggests.

◌ Be ready for

Monbiot is a polemicist by trade, and the book reads like one. The rhetoric is frequently thrilling; the nuance is occasionally sacrificed for impact. Read it as an argument to be engaged with, not a position to be simply adopted.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Feral worth reading?

Feral launched a genuinely consequential conversation about what we want our landscapes to be, and what we are willing to give up to get them. Monbiot is sometimes wrong in the details but right in the direction, and his vision of wild, complex, self-regulating nature is one that has lodged in the minds of policymakers, ecologists, and landowners across Europe.

Who should read Feral?

Anyone who has looked at a heavily managed British hillside — or any depleted landscape — and felt obscurely that something was missing, without knowing what or why.

What is Feral about in one sentence?

George Monbiot opens this book with an admission: he is bored.

The Verdict

*Feral* launched a genuinely consequential conversation about what we want our landscapes to be, and what we are willing to give up to get them. Monbiot is sometimes wrong in the details but right in the direction, and his vision of wild, complex, self-regulating nature is one that has lodged in the minds of policymakers, ecologists, and landowners across Europe.

→ Find on Amazon