In 1932, Scott Nearing — blacklisted from academia for his socialist views — and his partner Helen moved from New York City to a Vermont hillside with minimal money and no farming experience. Over the next twenty years they built a self-sufficient homestead using hand tools, grew most of their food, bartered for what they couldn't grow, and maintained time for music, reading, writing, and political engagement. *Living the Good Life* is their account of how they did it — and why.
The Four-Hour Day
The Nearings’ most famous principle — and the book’s most provocative argument — is the four-hour day. They organised their time into three equal blocks: four hours of “bread labour” (the physical work of maintaining the homestead), four hours of professional or creative work (writing, music, political activism), and four hours of social engagement and rest. This was not the exhausting twelve-hour day of farm mythology but a balanced, human-scale allocation of a day’s energy.
This was possible, they argued, because a self-sufficient homestead producing most of its own food, fuel, and shelter had dramatically lower cash expenses than a conventional household — and therefore required dramatically less paid employment. The simplicity of their needs enabled the balance of their days.
How They Did It
The practical sections of the book are meticulous and still useful: soil building and composting, stone wall construction, root cellar food storage, maple syrup production, and cash crop gardening. The Nearings were systematic and scientific in their approach — Scott’s academic training showed in the record-keeping and analysis they brought to each aspect of homestead management.
The practical detail distinguishes this book from more romantic back-to-the-land writing: the Nearings show their work, including the failures and adjustments, in a way that conveys the genuine difficulty and genuine satisfaction of what they achieved.
We sought to make a life that was honest and simple — to do our own work, feed ourselves from our own land, and have enough freedom from economic anxiety to think and act according to our own conscience. That, as near as we could manage, was the good life.
— Helen & Scott Nearing, Living the Good Life
6 Key Ideas From This Book
A self-sufficient household with modest cash needs can live well on four hours of physical labour per day — leaving four hours for creative or professional work and four hours for social life and rest. The path to this balance runs through reducing cash expenses rather than increasing income.
The Nearings' commitment to hand tools — avoiding power equipment, tractors, and machinery — was both a philosophical position (they wanted to understand and control their tools) and a practical one (hand tools are cheap, repairable, and don't require fuel). Their stone buildings, built by hand, are still standing.
The Nearings kept detailed accounts of labour, inputs, and outputs for every crop and project. This scientific approach to homesteading allowed them to identify what was worth growing and what wasn't, how to improve yields year over year, and what their actual cost of living was.
The Nearings maintained one cash crop — maple sugar — to generate the small amount of money they needed for taxes, tools, and items they couldn't produce. A self-sufficient life does not mean a cashless life, but it requires far less cash than a conventional one.
Every structure and system the Nearings built was designed for permanence rather than convenience. Stone walls rather than wooden fences; root cellars rather than refrigerators; perennial food plants rather than annual monocultures. The upfront investment of durability pays dividends for decades.
The Nearings did not retreat from politics — they made their homestead financially and physically independent precisely so they could continue their political and intellectual work without compromise. Self-sufficiency was a means to freedom, not an end in itself.
Any Weaknesses?
The Nearings benefited from advantages they don’t fully acknowledge: they were educated, connected, and — despite claiming poverty — had access to resources (Scott received inheritance money at a critical point) that most readers attempting to replicate their model would not.
The book also reflects a mid-century political and social context that some readers will find dated. Scott Nearing’s Marxist politics permeate the book’s framing and not all readers will share his ideological premises, though the practical content stands independently.
Anyone drawn to homesteading, self-sufficiency, or back-to-the-land living who wants the founding text — the template against which all subsequent homesteading literature has been written.
Radical Homemakers by Shannon Hayes for the feminist update of the Nearing model for contemporary households, and Animal, Vegetable, Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver for a modern family's experience of local food self-sufficiency.
Urban farmers and community garden organisers. The Nearings' systematic approach to soil building, crop selection, and labour accounting is applicable at garden scale as well as homestead scale.
The book is from 1954 and reads accordingly — earnest, thorough, occasionally political in ways that feel period-specific. The practical content is timeless; some of the ideological framing requires translation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Living the Good Life worth reading?
Living the Good Life launched the back-to-the-land movement and its influence has been felt in every subsequent wave of homesteading, sustainability, and simple living enthusiasm. Its central demonstration — that a balanced, creative, politically engaged life is possible outside the conventional economy — remains as radical and as inspiring as when the Nearings wrote it.
Who should read Living the Good Life?
Anyone drawn to homesteading, self-sufficiency, or back-to-the-land living who wants the founding text — the template against which all subsequent homesteading literature has been written.
What is Living the Good Life about in one sentence?
In 1932, Scott Nearing — blacklisted from academia for his socialist views — and his partner Helen moved from New York City to a Vermont hillside with minimal money and no farming experience.
The Verdict
*Living the Good Life* launched the back-to-the-land movement and its influence has been felt in every subsequent wave of homesteading, sustainability, and simple living enthusiasm. Its central demonstration — that a balanced, creative, politically engaged life is possible outside the conventional economy — remains as radical and as inspiring as when the Nearings wrote it.
→ Find on Amazon