Published in 1977, The Unsettling of America has not aged a day — which is a measure of how profoundly Berry understood what was happening to American farming and what it would cost. Forty-seven years later, the trends he identified have accelerated, the consequences he predicted have arrived, and the alternative he articulated remains as radical and as necessary as it was when he wrote it.
The Argument
Berry’s central claim is that the industrialisation of agriculture is not merely an economic transformation but a cultural and ecological catastrophe — a dissolution of the relationship between people, land, and community that had sustained human life across millennia. The USDA’s call to farmers to “get big or get out” — to specialise, borrow, mechanise, and expand — was not a prescription for prosperity but a prescription for the hollowing of rural life and the devastation of land.
He distinguishes sharply between the “exploiter” mentality — which views land as a resource to be used up — and the “nurturer” mentality — which views land as a community to be tended. Industrial agriculture is structurally an exploiter enterprise: its logic requires maximising short-term yields at the expense of long-term soil health, its scale prevents the intimate knowledge of particular places, and its financial pressures leave no margin for the kind of care that farming as a culture requires.
Why This Matters Now
Berry was writing at the beginning of the era of herbicide-tolerant crops, corporate consolidation of seed companies, and the financial mechanisms that would ultimately concentrate American farmland in fewer and fewer hands. He saw the trajectory clearly. Today, the top 10% of US farms by size account for about 75% of farm output; the rural communities that once sustained farming culture have largely been emptied; and the soil of the Midwest — built over millennia of prairie grass — is losing topsoil at rates that make permanent agriculture in its current form mathematically impossible.
The counterargument Berry offers is not nostalgia but attention: the kind of intimate knowledge of a particular piece of land, over time, that produces sustainable agriculture. This is not incompatible with modern knowledge — it requires it. What it is incompatible with is the scale and abstraction of industrial farming.
The care of the earth is our most ancient and most worthy and, after all, our most pleasing responsibility. To cherish what remains of it, and to foster its renewal, is our only legitimate hope.
— Wendell Berry, The Unsettling of America
6 Key Ideas From This Book
When farming becomes an industrial enterprise, the farmer becomes a manager of inputs and outputs rather than a steward of a place. This changes not just farming practice but the culture that surrounds it — the knowledge, the relationships, the habits of care that only accumulate when people are attached to specific land over long periods.
The USDA advice to specialise — to grow one crop and buy everything else — was presented as economic rationality. Berry argues it is ecological folly: the integrated farm, mixing crops and livestock, builds fertility and controls pests through diversity. The specialised farm requires external inputs to substitute for the biological processes that diversity would provide for free.
Berry argues that the disconnection from physical work — the trend toward larger machinery, fewer workers, more management — is not just an economic but a cultural and psychological loss. The farmer who works the land with their body knows it differently, and better, than one who manages it from a cab or an office.
The title essay argues that the history of American agriculture has been one of settling — of people moving to new land and mining it until it was exhausted, then moving on. Sustainable agriculture requires the opposite: a commitment to a place that leads to intimate knowledge and care over generations.
The chapter on food and eating argues that the industrial food system has severed the cultural meaning of food — its connection to particular places, seasons, and human relationships. Eating becomes a transaction rather than a participation in a cycle of life. This impoverishment is not trivial; it contributes to the broader disconnection from land and community that Berry diagnoses.
Berry's final argument is that the farm, properly understood, models a way of living in which skill, care, knowledge, and love of a place are the primary values. The industrial economy values none of these things. The restoration of farming culture is therefore not merely agricultural — it is the restoration of a form of human life that the industrial economy has almost entirely displaced.
Any Weaknesses?
Berry is explicitly a moralist as well as an agrarian, and his essays occasionally tip from argument into sermon. Readers who are not already sympathetic to his premises may find the tone alienating. The book is also written primarily for an American rural audience and context; its prescriptions are less directly applicable outside that setting.
The solutions Berry advocates — small-scale, place-specific, labour-intensive farming — are genuinely difficult to scale in a world with seven billion people and existing concentrations of land ownership. Berry acknowledges this but doesn’t resolve it.
Anyone who wants the deepest, most thoroughly worked-out philosophical critique of industrial agriculture — written not by an outside observer but by a farmer who has lived the alternative for decades.
The One-Straw Revolution by Masanobu Fukuoka for a Japanese parallel — a farmer reaching similar conclusions from a different tradition — and Folks, This Ain't Normal by Joel Salatin for a more accessible American voice in the same tradition.
Economists and urban planners. Berry's argument that the logic of industrial efficiency applied to farming destroys values that markets cannot price — soil health, community cohesion, cultural knowledge — is a precise critique of the limitations of economic analysis, highly relevant beyond agriculture.
Berry will make you angry about industrial agriculture and uncertain about easy solutions. This is the appropriate response. He is not offering a five-step programme; he is asking for a fundamental reorientation of values.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Unsettling of America worth reading?
One of the indispensable books of American environmental literature. The Unsettling of America has not dated because the crisis it describes has not been resolved — it has deepened. Berry's moral clarity and prose precision make it essential reading for anyone who eats and cares about how food is grown.
Who should read The Unsettling of America?
Anyone who wants the deepest, most thoroughly worked-out philosophical critique of industrial agriculture — written not by an outside observer but by a farmer who has lived the alternative for decades.
What is The Unsettling of America about in one sentence?
Published in 1977, The Unsettling of America has not aged a day — which is a measure of how profoundly Berry understood what was happening to American farming and what it would cost.
The Verdict
One of the indispensable books of American environmental literature. The Unsettling of America has not dated because the crisis it describes has not been resolved — it has deepened. Berry's moral clarity and prose precision make it essential reading for anyone who eats and cares about how food is grown.
→ Find on Amazon